|
As
most of us know only too well, weight gain occurs when we consume
more calories than we burn during daily activities, including
exercise. These excess calories are then stored as fat.
This
trend is particularly evident among Americans, and is increasing
each year. In fact, the Journal Of the American Medical Association
states that the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity has increased
to 64.5% of Americans in 1999-2000 from 55.9% in1994.1
Though
many of us are aware of carrying excess weight, we may not know
where to begin in our quest towards a healthier and more fit body.
A great place to start is to determine your body compositionthe
ratio of body fat to lean muscleas it has a direct impact
on your weight, fitness, health and life expectancy.
You
can ascertain your body composition through body fat testing.
Many Americans lack a clear understanding of their fitnessrelying
only on the bathroom scale to determine body weight.
However,
fat weighs considerably less than muscle, but takes much more
space. Therefore, the bathroom scale is a highly inaccurate gauge
of fitness, as it fails to differentiate between fat and lean
muscle.
Conversely,
body fat testing to determine your ratio of fat to lean muscle
provides a far more accurate picture of your true fitness.
Without
exercise, you may find over time that although the scale indicates
your usual weight, your clothing size continues to increase.
|
|
The
body tends to gradually exchange lean muscle for fat. By mid-life,
your metabolism is likely to be increasingly less efficient due
to a higher ratio of fat to lean muscle. Few people track this ratio,
relying instead on the bathroom scale.
The good
news is that you can reverse this unhealthy trend. By embarking
on a committed fitness program, you will likely find that as you
convert fat to lean muscle, you reduce your clothing size while
maintaining or even gaining weight.
These changes
will be reflected in your improved body composition and Body Mass
Index (BMI). Your BMI is simply the measure of your weight adjusted
for height.
According
to Walter C. Willett, M.D., a BMI of more than 25 increases the
risk of dying early, mainly from heart disease and cancer. He
notes that BMIs between 25 and 30 should be considered overweight,
and more than 30 is regarded as obese.
You can have
your BMI calculated in seconds at www.halls.md/body-mass-index/bmi.htm.
The American College of Sports Medicine asserts that the healthy
body fat percentage range for men between the ages of 30-39 would
be between 12-21% body fat, while women in the same age range
would ideally be between 17-25%.
Determining
your body composition will provide you with an accurate starting
place for healthy weight loss. If you have a higher than ideal
percentage of body fat to lean muscle, reducing that percentage
is your best bet to reach and maintain a healthy weight.
|
|
Then,
taking advantage of a body fat test every few months while you pursue
your weight loss goals will allow you to track your progress as
you move towards a healthier body fat percentage.
Recent research
indicates that women between the ages of 30-50 who engaged in
regular physical activity were able to maintain lower body fat
levels and body mass indexes than their sedentary peers.2
They also
showed a consistently higher metabolic rate, even at rest. For
similar benefits, you should aim for a minimum of 20-30 minutes
of exercise daily, 3-5 times per week.
The more
lean muscle mass you have, the more efficient your metabolic function
will be. This means that you can consume far more calories than
someone with a higher body fat percentage, and still retain a
lean and healthy frame.
The advantages
of improving your ratio of body fat to lean muscle are apparent,
but you need a baseline understanding of where you are to determine
and track where you want to be.
For more
information about body fat testing, contact Kiki Powers at kiki@aboutnhs.com.
References
1
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends
in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7
2
Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2001 Oct;101(10):1181-8
|